The Loyal Karyakarta's: Trapped, Used, and Discarded by Politicians

The Art of Political Manipulation: How Politicians Control Their Karyakarta's

In the grand theater of politics, the role of the karyakarta (party worker) is indispensable. These foot soldiers are the backbone of any political party, working tirelessly to rally support, mobilize voters, and ensure the success of their leaders. However, while they remain devoted to the party, their own aspirations and growth are often carefully controlled. Politicians have mastered the art of keeping their karyakarta's exactly where they need them—loyal, dependent, and expendable—while securing a brighter future for their own families.

1. Keeping Karyakarta's Loyal Through Emotional Traps

Politicians understand the power of emotional manipulation. They create an illusion of a familial bond between themselves and their karyakartas. Frequent personal interactions, small favors, and public appreciation keep these workers emotionally invested. However, this loyalty is rarely rewarded with genuine political or economic upliftment. Instead, they are kept in a perpetual cycle of service, where their only reward is the promise of future recognition.

2. Preventing Education and Awareness

An educated and well-informed karyakarta is a threat to the system. If they start questioning policies, demanding accountability, or seeking personal growth, they may challenge the status quo. To prevent this, politicians subtly discourage education and intellectual growth among their workers. Instead of encouraging them to develop skills, they keep them engaged in low-level political activities, ensuring they remain dependent on the party for survival.

3. The Art of Brainwashing

Repeated slogans, orchestrated narratives, and ideological reinforcement play a crucial role in maintaining control. Karyakarta's are made to believe that their leader is the ultimate savior, and any opposition is a betrayal. Political parties control media, social platforms, and propaganda machinery to shape perceptions. This ensures that karyakarta's do not think independently but rather act as extensions of their leader’s will.

4. Selective Opportunities: Sons and Daughters Rise, Karyakarta's Stagnate

While the loyal karyakarta's struggle at the grassroots level, the children of politicians are strategically placed in positions of power. They receive top-tier education, high-profile opportunities, and direct access to influential networks. The karyakarta's, despite their years of service, are rarely promoted beyond a certain level. This dynastic cycle ensures that power remains within the elite circles while the hardworking foot soldiers remain foot soldiers forever.

5. Handouts Instead of Real Growth

To maintain their dependency, politicians often provide temporary handouts—small financial assistance, employment promises, or symbolic recognition. These are strategically timed before elections to maintain loyalty. However, there is no structural support to genuinely improve the lives of karyakarta's. They are kept in a state of controlled economic struggle so that they never gain enough independence to question the system.

The Need for Awareness and Change

The political system thrives on maintaining a structured hierarchy where karyakarta's remain at the bottom, ensuring the success of those at the top. If real empowerment is to happen, karyakarta's must recognize these tactics and demand better education, financial independence, and opportunities for growth. Only then can the cycle of manipulation be broken, paving the way for a more equitable political landscape.

Preschooling: A Scam and a Waste of Time

In modern society, preschooling is often presented as an essential foundation for a child's education. Parents are bombarded with messages emphasizing early childhood education as the key to success. However, a closer examination of the preschool industry reveals that it is largely a scam—a business-driven initiative that capitalizes on parental fears while offering little to no tangible long-term benefits. Preschooling is an unnecessary expense, fails to deliver significant academic advantages, and undermines natural childhood development.

The Business of Preschooling: A Financial Drain

Preschools have evolved into a multi-billion-dollar industry, profiting from the anxieties of well-intentioned parents who are led to believe that their child's future depends on early education. Tuition fees for private preschools can be exorbitantly high, often exceeding thousands of dollars per year. Public preschools, while less expensive, still consume taxpayer money without delivering measurable improvements in long-term academic performance. The industry thrives on aggressive marketing tactics, convincing parents that without structured preschool education, their children will fall behind. However, studies show that many of the academic advantages preschoolers may gain disappear by the time they reach third grade, rendering the entire experience financially wasteful.

Minimal Academic Benefits and Short-Lived Gains

Proponents argue that preschool helps children develop basic literacy, numeracy, and social skills. However, research consistently finds that the academic benefits of preschool are minimal and short-lived. The so-called “head start” that preschoolers receive often fades by the time they enter elementary school. The 2012 study by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on the Head Start program concluded that by third grade, there was little to no difference between children who attended preschool and those who did not. This exposes preschooling as a glorified daycare system rather than a crucial step in academic success. Instead of pouring money into an ineffective system, parents could teach these same skills at home through natural learning experiences.

Undermining Natural Childhood Development

Preschooling often disrupts the natural development of children by imposing rigid structures too early in life. Young children thrive through unstructured play, exploration, and interactions with family members rather than through forced academic lessons in a classroom setting. Countries like Finland, which consistently outperform others in educational rankings, delay formal education until the age of seven, allowing children to develop naturally and stress-free. The rush to place children in structured learning environments at such a young age strips them of their curiosity, creativity, and emotional security, leading to increased stress and burnout later in life.

Better Alternatives to Preschool

Rather than spending thousands of dollars on preschool, parents can achieve the same or better results through alternative means. Homeschooling during the early years allows children to learn at their own pace without unnecessary pressure. Community-driven learning experiences, such as playgroups, library programs, and real-world interactions, offer far richer developmental benefits than sitting in a preschool classroom. Additionally, spending time with parents and siblings fosters emotional intelligence, communication skills, and strong family bonds—something no preschool curriculum can replicate.

Conclusion

The preschool industry is an unnecessary, profit-driven institution that preys on parental fears while offering little long-term value. Its alleged benefits are overstated, its financial burden is substantial, and its rigid structure disrupts natural childhood development. Instead of enrolling children in preschool, parents should embrace home-based learning and community-driven educational experiences that are more effective, more economical, and more aligned with a child’s natural growth. It is time to challenge the societal norm that preschooling is necessary and recognize it for what it truly is: a scam and a waste of time.

Chandrababu Naidu’s AI and Quantum Dream: Visionary Leap or Political Gimmick?

India’s AI and Quantum Push: Progress or Just Another Illusion?

Recent News Headlines:

1. Naidu Tells Students to Use AI for Decision-Making

2. CM Naidu Announces AP’s Ambitious Plan to Set Up Quantum Valley in Amaravati

3. Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu Invites IIT-M Students to Contribute

4. Andhra CM Chandrababu Naidu Tells Officials to Develop AI-Driven Policing Model

The Reality Behind the Hype

For decades, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have been producing a large number of tech graduates, many of whom sought opportunities in the United States under the H-1B visa program. Indian professionals became a significant workforce in Silicon Valley, gaining expertise in cutting-edge fields like AI, data science, and quantum computing. However, what started as a pathway to global competitiveness soon turned into an exploitative cycle where U.S. companies and Indian consultancies began misusing the H-1B system. This led to stricter immigration policies, ultimately reducing opportunities for Indian professionals abroad.

With fewer H-1B visas available and increased scrutiny from the U.S. government, the focus has now shifted back to India. However, instead of creating a solid foundation of original research and technological innovation, political leaders and bureaucrats are promoting grand projects without addressing fundamental issues such as educational quality, real-world applications, and the integrity of data.

The Manipulation: A Mirage of Progress

While announcements like AI-driven policing, Quantum Valleys, and AI decision-making tools sound futuristic and promising, the real question remains: Where is the proof of impact?

India has long suffered from manipulated, misleading, and incomplete data. From inflated GDP numbers to questionable employment statistics, the country has a history of presenting a rosy picture while ignoring ground realities. The same is happening with AI and quantum computing—buzzwords are thrown around without actual expertise backing them up.

Key Issues:

• Fake or Misleading Data: Many government reports and presentations rely on incorrect or exaggerated figures to create an illusion of progress.

• Lack of Expertise: Politicians and bureaucrats with no technical background are making crucial decisions about AI and quantum computing, often without consulting true experts.

• Hype Without Execution: Grand declarations are made, but they lack transparency, execution plans, and real accountability.

• The Education Paradox: Despite producing thousands of engineers every year, India struggles with a serious lack of hands-on expertise in deep tech fields.

Wake Up: India Needs Truth, Not Hype

For India to truly lead in AI and quantum computing, the nation must move beyond empty rhetoric and focus on:

• Data Integrity: Before making AI-driven decisions, ensure that the data used is real, accurate, and unbiased.

• Independent Think Tanks: Decision-making should not be left solely to politicians and bureaucrats; independent experts must be involved.

• Practical Implementation: Instead of chasing headlines, projects should have measurable, tangible impact on society.

• Global Standards: Learning from international best practices and building genuine collaborations rather than relying on inflated self-praise.

If India continues down the path of hype over substance, the dream of becoming a tech superpower will remain just that—a dream. It’s time to question, investigate, and demand real results. Otherwise, we risk repeating history where promises are made, funds are allocated, and yet, nothing changes for the common citizen.

The APAAR ID: A Step Toward Digital Enslavement of India’s Youth

In an era where personal freedom and privacy are increasingly under threat, the Indian government’s introduction of the Automated Permanent Academic Account Registry (APAAR) ID stands out as a disturbing overreach into the lives of its citizens—particularly its youngest and most vulnerable population. Touted as a revolutionary tool under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, the APAAR ID promises a "seamless digital academic journey" by assigning every student in India a unique 12-digit identification number to track their educational progress. However, beneath the glossy veneer of efficiency and modernization lies a deeply troubling initiative that compromises privacy, fosters exclusion, and paves the way for a dystopian surveillance state.

A Trojan Horse for Privacy Invasion

The APAAR ID is not just an academic identifier; it is a lifelong digital tether that binds students to a centralized database from pre-primary school through higher education and beyond. Linked to Aadhaar—a biometric ID system already mired in controversy for its mandatory creep into every aspect of Indian life—the APAAR ID collects sensitive personal and academic data, including marksheets, co-curricular achievements, and even health details like blood group, height, and weight. This vast trove of information, stored in the cloud via DigiLocker, is accessible not only to educational institutions but also to unspecified "government agencies" and potentially third parties, all under the flimsy guise of parental consent.

The government claims this data will remain secure and be used solely for educational purposes. Yet, India’s track record with data protection is far from reassuring. The absence of a fully implemented Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) as of March 2025 leaves students’ information vulnerable to breaches, misuse, and unauthorized access. Reports of Aadhaar data leaks and the lack of transparency surrounding APAAR’s operational framework only amplify these concerns. Parents and students are being asked to trust a system that offers no concrete safeguards, no opt-out mechanism, and no clarity on how this data might be exploited in the future—be it for commercial gain, political profiling, or worse.

Coercion Masquerading as Consent

While the Ministry of Education insists that APAAR registration is voluntary, the reality on the ground tells a different story. Schools across states like Karnataka, Maharashtra, and Andhra Pradesh have been directed to hold special parent-teacher meetings to secure consent, often presenting it as a fait accompli rather than a choice. Reports have surfaced of students being denied admission or penalized for failing to comply, echoing the coercive tactics that made Aadhaar a de facto requirement despite Supreme Court rulings limiting its mandatory use. The APAAR ID appears to be a sly workaround to bypass these judicial protections, effectively laundering Aadhaar’s authority into the education system under a new name.

For parents, the consent process is a sham. The fine print reveals that withdrawing consent does not undo data already processed, leaving families with no real control over their children’s digital footprint. This is not empowerment—it’s entrapment. The integration of APAAR with the Academic Bank of Credits (ABC) and DigiLocker further entrenches this system, creating an interoperable web of surveillance that could one day dictate access to scholarships, jobs, or even basic rights based on a student’s digitized history.

Exacerbating Inequality and Exclusion

Proponents of APAAR argue it will streamline academic mobility and reduce fraud. But in a country marked by a stark digital divide, this initiative risks deepening inequality. Millions of students in rural and marginalized communities lack reliable access to the internet or the devices needed to engage with DigiLocker or the APAAR portal. For these families, navigating a complex digital bureaucracy is not a convenience—it’s a barrier. The insistence on Aadhaar linkage only compounds the problem, as countless children from nomadic, destitute, or undocumented households remain excluded from the Aadhaar system altogether. What happens to these students when APAAR becomes a prerequisite for education? The answer is clear: they will be left behind, their right to education sacrificed on the altar of technological "progress."

A Blueprint for Social Control

Perhaps the most chilling aspect of APAAR is its potential as a stepping stone to a broader social credit system. Critics on platforms like X have warned that this ID could evolve into a tool for monitoring compliance—whether to vaccination schedules, behavioral norms, or government mandates—denying non-compliant students access to schooling or opportunities. While such scenarios may sound speculative, the global trend toward digital IDs linked to centralized databases offers a sobering precedent. In a nation where dissent is increasingly stifled, APAAR could become a mechanism to profile and punish from an early age, conditioning children to accept surveillance as a fact of life.

A Call to Resist

The APAAR ID is not a benign administrative upgrade; it is a dangerous experiment in control, cloaked in the language of innovation. It undermines the Supreme Court’s stance on privacy, exploits parental trust, and threatens to exclude the most vulnerable while normalizing a future of perpetual monitoring. Education should be a space for growth and freedom, not a proving ground for digital authoritarianism.

Parents, students, and educators must reject this initiative outright. Demand transparency, insist on opt-out rights, and challenge the unchecked expansion of state power into our children’s lives. The promise of a "One Nation, One Student ID" may sound unifying, but its reality is divisive, invasive, and profoundly unjust. India’s youth deserve better than to be reduced to data points in a government spreadsheet. Let us protect their future by condemning APAAR today.

The Age of AI: Time to End the Overpaid Middle Manager Gravy Train

The corporate world has long been a cushy haven for a certain breed of professional: the middle manager who rakes in ₹2-3 lakhs a month, armed with little more than a fancy title and the ability to herd a team through endless meetings. Their contribution? Often negligible—leading without innovating, delegating without creating, coasting on the efforts of those below them. But the age of artificial intelligence is here, and it’s exposing these paper tigers for what they are. Gone are the days when a fat paycheck could be justified by a corner office and a knack for PowerPoint. In this new era, these figureheads should be lucky to pull in ₹60-90k—tops. It’s time for a reckoning.

The Overpaid Relic of a Bygone Era

For decades, middle management has been the backbone of corporate inertia. These are the guys—and let’s be honest, it’s usually guys—who climbed the ladder not through brilliance or results but through tenure, charisma, or sheer luck. Their job description? Vague at best. “Lead the team,” “align stakeholders,” “drive strategy”—jargon that sounds impressive but often translates to forwarding emails, nodding in boardrooms, and taking credit for the real work done by engineers, analysts, and frontline staff. At ₹2-3 lakhs a month, they’ve been living the dream, insulated by a system that rewards presence over performance.

But AI is rewriting the rules. Tools like generative models, predictive analytics, and automation are doing what these managers never could: streamlining processes, crunching data, and delivering insights at lightning speed. What took a ₹3-lakh-a-month manager a week of “strategizing” can now be done by an AI in hours—and better. The days of justifying bloated salaries with vague leadership platitudes are over.

AI’s Ruthless Efficiency

Consider the evidence. AI platforms can now handle project management, track team performance, and even suggest optimizations—all without a coffee break or a motivational speech. Companies like Atlassian and Monday.com integrate AI to automate workflows, while tools like Copilot and ChatGPT draft reports and emails faster than any manager could dictate them. Leadership? AI-driven sentiment analysis can gauge team morale more accurately than a manager’s gut feel. Strategy? Machine learning models forecast trends with precision no human intuition can match.

This isn’t a distant future—it’s happening now. A 2024 McKinsey report estimated that 30% of tasks in management roles could be automated by AI, with that number climbing as the tech evolves. Why pay ₹2 lakhs for someone to “oversee” when an AI subscription costing a fraction of that can do it smarter? The writing’s on the wall: if your job is to lead without adding tangible value, you’re obsolete.

The ₹60-90k Reality Check

So what’s a fair wage for these erstwhile high-flyers? ₹60-90k a month feels right—enough to live comfortably, but reflective of their diminished utility. At this level, they’d be paid for what they actually do: basic coordination, a bit of human touch, and maybe some morale-boosting banter. The rest—the heavy lifting of decision-making, analysis, and innovation—is increasingly AI’s domain. Companies aren’t charities; they shouldn’t be shelling out six figures for glorified babysitters.

This isn’t about dehumanizing work—it’s about fairness. The coder grinding out algorithms at ₹1 lakh a month, the sales rep hitting quotas for ₹80k, the designer crafting campaigns for ₹70k—they’re the ones driving value. Why should a manager who merely “leads” them earn triple? In the AI age, compensation should mirror contribution, not hierarchy. The gravy train has derailed, and it’s about time.

The Pushback and the Push Forward

Of course, the ₹3-lakh brigade won’t go quietly. They’ll argue they’re indispensable—culture keepers, vision setters, the glue holding teams together. But let’s be real: culture thrives on results, not pep talks, and vision comes from innovators, not overseers. AI doesn’t replace human leadership entirely, but it exposes the fluff. The managers who survive will be the ones who adapt—learning to wield AI, upskilling in data science, or pivoting to roles that demand creativity over bureaucracy. Those who don’t? They’ll cling to their titles until the layoffs hit.

Companies, too, must wake up. Bloated payrolls are a liability in a competitive world where AI-driven firms like Tesla and Google set the pace. Trimming the fat isn’t cruel—it’s survival. Redirect those savings to R&D, frontline talent, or customer impact, and watch the bottom line soar.

The New Corporate Order

The age of AI isn’t just a tech revolution—it’s a cultural one. It demands we rethink who gets paid what and why. The days of ₹2-3 lakhs for steering the ship while others row are done. ₹60-90k is the new ceiling for the title-toting, low-impact manager—and even that’s generous. The future belongs to the doers, the builders, the ones who create value, not just claim it. Middle management had a good run, but AI’s here to collect the bill. Pay up or step aside.

India: The Mirage of an AI Superpower

India has been crowned the "fake AI hub capital" by some—a provocative label that cuts through the glossy headlines and ambitious government proclamations. On paper, the nation is racing toward AI supremacy, with initiatives like the IndiaAI Mission, a burgeoning startup ecosystem, and a vast pool of tech talent. But beneath the surface, a stark reality emerges: a country grappling with crumbling infrastructure, widespread unemployment, and a talent exodus cannot credibly claim the mantle of an AI superpower. Are we chasing a hollow dream, a superpower status that exists only in speeches and press releases? Where are we heading with this illusion, and at what cost?

The Facade of AI Ambition

India’s AI narrative is seductive. The government touts a $1 billion investment in the IndiaAI Mission, partnerships with global tech giants like Nvidia, and a startup scene that’s raised $7.7 billion. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has repeatedly declared India’s intent to become a global AI hub, leveraging its "digital prowess" and youthful workforce. The rhetoric is intoxicating—India as the quiet builder, the dark horse poised to outpace the U.S. and China. But scratch the surface, and the cracks appear.

For a nation aspiring to lead in artificial intelligence, the foundation is shaky. Basic facilities—reliable electricity, high-speed internet, and robust educational infrastructure—are still luxuries for millions. Rural India, home to over 60% of the population, often lacks the connectivity needed to even access AI tools, let alone develop them. Urban centers like Bengaluru and Hyderabad may buzz with tech activity, but they’re islands in a sea of neglect. How can a country that struggles to provide consistent power to its citizens power the data centers and computational grids required for cutting-edge AI?

The Employment Paradox

The irony is biting: India boasts one of the world’s largest pools of STEM graduates, yet unemployment among these skilled workers is rampant. A 2023 report highlighted that over 40% of Indian graduates remain jobless, with engineering graduates particularly hard-hit. The IT sector, once a beacon of opportunity, is stagnating under the weight of automation and global competition. AI, rather than creating jobs, threatens to displace millions in a country where call centers and back-office operations—prime targets for AI automation—employ vast numbers.

The experts who could turn India into an AI superpower are leaving. Brain drain is not a new story, but it’s accelerating. Posts on X and industry analyses suggest machine learning engineers are migrating to the U.S., Canada, and Europe, lured by better pay, infrastructure, and opportunities to work on foundational models. India has yet to produce a single globally competitive AI model, while the U.S. boasts 43 and China 19. Our R&D spending, a measly 0.64% of GDP, pales against the 2-3% invested by AI leaders. Without investment in research and a domestic ecosystem to retain talent, India’s AI superpower status is a castle built on sand.

A Superpower on Paper

The disconnect between ambition and reality is glaring. Initiatives like Bhashini, which aims to integrate Indian languages into AI, and AIRAWAT, a cloud-computing platform for research, are laudable but embryonic. Meanwhile, the U.S. pours $500 billion into projects like Stargate, and China commits $137 billion to its AI ecosystem. India’s $1 billion mission, while a step forward, is a drop in the bucket. Startups, despite their energy, lack the capital and computational resources to compete globally. The result? A superpower narrative that thrives in policy documents and conference halls but falters in execution.

This paper tiger approach risks more than embarrassment—it breeds complacency. By focusing on optics—hosting summits, chairing the Global Partnership on AI—India diverts attention from the gritty work of building infrastructure, upskilling workers, and fostering innovation. The danger is not just falling behind but becoming a vassal state, a back-office for Western AI giants rather than a creator of its own destiny.

Where Are We Heading?

If India continues down this path, the future is grimly predictable. We’ll produce coders, not innovators; implementers, not inventors. Our talent will fuel Silicon Valley’s breakthroughs while our own AI landscape remains barren. The lack of foundational models—think India’s ChatGPT or DeepSeek—means we’ll import solutions rather than export them, deepening dependency on foreign tech. Economic inequality will widen as AI benefits accrue to a tiny urban elite, leaving rural India further behind.

But there’s a flip side—a provocation to act. India’s strengths are real: a massive, youthful workforce, a knack for frugal innovation, and a growing digital economy. The Unified Payments Interface (UPI) revolutionized payments; could AI follow suit? To turn the tide, we must confront the basics—electrify villages, connect the disconnected, and fund R&D like our future depends on it. Upskilling must go beyond buzzwords, targeting not just elite IITs but the millions of graduates languishing without opportunity. And we must stop the talent bleed, creating an ecosystem where innovation pays more than emigration.

The Reckoning

India’s AI superpower dream isn’t dead—it’s just dangerously close to becoming a mirage. Calling it a "fake AI hub capital" isn’t just a jab; it’s a wake-up call. We can’t wallpaper over crumbling foundations with press releases. The world won’t wait for us to catch up, and neither should we. If we’re serious about this race, it’s time to stop posturing and start building—before the ink on our superpower certificate fades to nothing. Where are we heading? That depends on whether we choose reality over rhetoric. The clock is ticking.

India’s Biggest Challenge: Changing the Mindset, Not Just the Leaders

India faces many problems—corruption, unemployment, poor education, pollution, and lack of innovation. Every few years, people hope that new politicians, new policies, or new experts will fix everything. But nothing changes. Why? Because the same people with the same old mindset are trying to solve the problems they helped create in the first place.

Expecting them to fix things is not just foolish—it is impossible.

The Problem is Not Just the Leaders, It’s the Mindset

We blame politicians for corruption, but who votes for them? Who supports them despite their failures? Who sells their vote for freebies and short-term benefits instead of demanding real change? The politicians we have are a reflection of the people’s mindset. If people do not think differently, how can we expect the leaders to be different?

We expect scientists to bring innovation, but are we willing to take risks? Are we supporting new ideas? No. We prefer safe government jobs over entrepreneurship. We celebrate memorization over creativity in education. How can we lead in science and technology with such a mindset?

We expect economic growth, but do we respect hard work and merit? No. We promote nepotism and favoritism over talent. We want easy money, shortcuts, and government handouts instead of building a strong economy based on skill and effort. How can we become a global power with such thinking?

Einstein’s Warning: You Can’t Solve a Problem With the Same Thinking That Created It

Albert Einstein once said, “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.” This is exactly India’s situation today. The old way of thinking has failed, yet we keep using the same mindset to find solutions.

• We follow rules blindly but don’t ask if they make sense.
• We wait for politicians to fix things instead of fixing them ourselves.
• We value power and position more than intelligence and honesty.
• We expect change without changing our own behavior.

This mindset must change if India wants to progress.

Young India Must Lead the Change

The young generation must break this cycle. If India wants to be a true global leader, young people must start thinking differently.

1. Question Everything – Don’t accept things just because “it has always been this way.” Ask, “Why?” and “Is this the best way?”
2. Stop Worshipping Politicians – Politicians work for the people, not the other way around. Hold them accountable.
3. Support Innovation – Encourage and respect people who think differently. Stop ridiculing new ideas.
4. Value Hard Work Over Shortcuts – Real success comes from effort, not corruption, nepotism, or bribes.
5. Take Responsibility – Don’t wait for someone else to fix things. If you see a problem, do something about it.

Conclusion: Without a New Mindset, India Will Struggle

India has everything it needs to become a superpower—brilliant minds, vast resources, and a rich history of knowledge. But without a change in mindset, all of this will go to waste. A country’s future is not decided by its leaders alone. It is shaped by its people.

The question is—will the young generation break free from the old way of thinking? Or will India continue to expect change while doing the same things over and over again?

The choice is ours.