Tradition or Tool? The Urgent Need for Integrity in Teaching Indian Traditional Knowledge

The Urgent Need for Integrity in Teaching Indian Traditional Knowledge

Indian Traditional Knowledge is not a relic of the past—it is a living reservoir of wisdom, ethics, ecology, and experience. From Ayurveda to Siddha, from the Vedas to the Sangam literature, from tribal healing to architectural marvels like the stepwells of Gujarat and temples of Tamil Nadu, our civilizational legacy spans not only centuries but also regions, languages, and philosophies.

The National Education Policy (NEP-2020) and UGC’s push for open electives such as "Indian Traditional Knowledge (22EGO03)" offers a much-needed opportunity to reconnect with this heritage. But in many classrooms and institutions, a concerning trend is emerging—the selective teaching of tradition, political color-washing, and cultural exclusion in the name of patriotism.


The Constitution Says “Union of States”—Why Is Our Curriculum Saying Otherwise?

India is not a single-language, single-faith, or single-culture nation. It is a union of states, each with its own deep-rooted traditions.

If a course claims to teach Indian traditional knowledge, why stop at Ayurveda? Why not include Siddha, Unani, and tribal medicine?
If it includes the chant “Jai Shri Ram,” why does it hesitate to also explore “Praise the Lord,” “Allah Hu Akbar,” “Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa,” and “Buddham Sharanam Gacchami”?

This is not about comparing religions—it’s about honoring plurality, as enshrined in the Indian Constitution.

The moment Indian Traditional Knowledge is used to amplify only one narrative, it ceases to be education and starts becoming indoctrination.


Tradition Should Not Be Fossilized—It Should Be Humanized

True tradition is not about repeating rituals mindlessly. It is about contextual wisdom. What worked for a society 500 years ago was built around their climate, economy, and culture.

We must teach students not just what traditions were, but why they were practiced, how they evolved, and most importantly—how to reinterpret them in today's context.

  • Teach Ayurveda, but also teach nutrition science and public health.

  • Teach the Ramayana, but also the Bhakti and Sufi movements that democratized spirituality.

  • Teach ancient math, but also teach how it can solve today’s data problems.

The real tradition worth preserving is humanity, dignity, and empathy—not just ritual, symbolism, or slogans.


Are We Educating or Engineering Ideology?

Let’s ask a bold question—are some institutions using NEP and UGC directives not to educate, but to politically program?

Are teachers being subtly nudged to promote one faith’s heroes while erasing others?
Are students being told “this is our culture,” without being shown the full cultural spectrum?

This is dangerous. Not just politically, but pedagogically.

A good teacher teaches facts. A great teacher teaches perspectives. But a manipulative teacher teaches half-truths with full certainty.


We Need Responsible Faculty Development—Not Cultural Conditioning

Faculty Development Programs (FDPs) around Indian Traditional Knowledge must be reimagined—not as cultural boot camps, but as critical thinking laboratories.

Faculty must be equipped with:

  • Balanced content across India's cultural and linguistic regions.

  • Historical context and philosophical plurality.

  • Skills to compare and contrast, not blindly copy or venerate.

  • Tools to encourage interfaith and intercultural dialogue, not division.


Let’s Give Students Truth, Not Tinted Narratives

A student who understands why a tradition existed is more empowered than one who is told simply to follow it.
A student who learns to respect all traditions is more patriotic than one who is conditioned to cheer only one.
A student who can connect the past to today’s pressing issues—climate change, inequality, mental health—is the future India needs.


Conclusion: Reclaiming Education with Integrity

Indian Traditional Knowledge is not a weapon. It is a mirror—one that reflects the diversity, complexity, and genius of a civilization that is still unfolding.

Let us not turn that mirror into a tool for political messaging. Let us honor it, teach it ethically, and equip students to carry it forward—not with dogma, but with dignity and depth.

If we do not protect the sanctity of education now, we may soon find ourselves raising students who can chant slogans but cannot think critically.

And that is a tradition we should never begin.



Comments