Why a Child’s Essay on “Thieves” Reveals More About Our Economy

 The Shadow That Fuels the System

Why a Child’s Essay on “Thieves” Reveals More About Our Economy Than We Might Care to Admit

---

What happens when an 8th standard student dismantles conventional morality with calm precision—and ends up exposing an economic blueprint many adults choose to ignore?

The essay begins innocently enough: “Thieves are an important part of a nation’s economy.” It reads like satire at first. But as the argument unfolds, it becomes disturbingly lucid. From safes and locks to lawyers and jailors, the child lays bare an uncomfortable truth—entire industries owe their existence to the anticipation, mitigation, or aftermath of theft.

A Lock Is Only Made for a Thief

Manufacturing sectors thrive making cupboards, lockers, and surveillance equipment. Tradespeople install grills, gates, and alarm systems. The ripple continues: security guards are hired, police forces expand, courts fill their calendars. From civil infrastructure to corporate budgets, the presence of theft is baked into our systems.

And when stolen items are replaced—mobiles, cars, even lipstick—consumption spikes. GDP grows. Business booms.

Justice or Just Machinery?

The essay’s brilliance isn’t in glorifying crime—it’s in reflecting how deeply crime is woven into societal design. When theft happens, so do investigations, hearings, legal briefs. And yes, jobs. One child calmly observes: “Thanks to thieves, jails and jailers have jobs.” That isn’t just irony—it’s brutal insight.

The system doesn't just respond to dysfunction—it requires it.

Politics: The Final Punchline

In one swift move, the child pulls back the curtain: “Famous and notorious thieves often enter politics, where even bigger thefts take place.” That line isn’t just provocative—it’s prophetic. It shifts the discussion from small-time theft to institutional looting disguised as governance. That’s the sort of critique even seasoned journalists whisper.

Perspective Is Dangerous—Because It’s Free

So why did the teacher award full marks? Because truth, when seen from a fresh angle, is disruptive. And this student disrupted like a philosopher in a courtroom.

The essay doesn’t defend theft—it dismantles the illusion of a morally neutral economy. It shows us that systems don’t rise from ideals alone—they often evolve around fear, control, and profit.

---

📢 So the question becomes:
If a thief props up the system, what does that say about the system’s integrity?
And if a child can see through it, why can’t we?

Let’s stop punishing insight and start building a society that doesn’t need dysfunction to stay afloat.